Browse or search our archive of UK fertility articles and news stories.
This is the second in a series of films documenting the recent event 'Does Fertility Treatment Still Need to Be a Medical Secret?', produced by the Progress Educational Trust in partnership with the Scottish Government.
The film features a presentation by Gwenda Burns, chief executive of Fertility Network UK.
Anyone who donated sperm, eggs or embryos in the UK before April 2005 was promised life-long anonymity.
But has the rise of home DNA testing changed the possibility of identifying Natasha's donor and genetic siblings?
Sally Cheshire, Chair of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), said that what fertility patients want most of all is a baby, or at least the chance to have a baby. She explained that many patients will do anything to achieve their aim, and that the regulator's job is to help them achieve this in the best way possible, as part of good care.
The subject of this year's Progress Educational Trust annual conference, entitled 'Reality Check', was 'a realistic look at assisted reproduction'. The choice of focus was motivated by ongoing controversy surrounding so-called 'IVF add-ons'. These are defined by the HFEA as 'optional extras that you may be offered on top of your normal fertility treatment, often at an additional cost'.
The latest meeting organised by the Progress Educational Trust (PET) asked the question 'Does fertility treatment still need to be a medical secret?' The event in Edinburgh last week, held in partnership with the Scottish Government, took place off the Royal Mile - through a narrow alleyway in Riddle's Court, one of the many old and imposing buildings scattered throughout the city.
Although cancer doctors know it’s important to talk about fertility concerns with young women patients, they may feel uncomfortable and unprepared to discuss the issue, a study in Canada suggests.