Good odds for baby number two using IVF

by | May 10, 2020 | UK Fertility News

Many couples who have used in vitro fertilisation (IVF) to conceive a baby will likely need it again if they want another child – and the odds are better the second time round, according to a study published in the journal Human Reproduction. By Natalie Parletta

The study found that if a woman had a successful live birth following IVF, she had up to 81% chance of delivering a second baby following three cycles of the assisted reproductive technology (ART), although this decreased with mum’s age.

The study is the first known to calculate the odds of having a second baby using ART, says senior researcher Georgina Chambers from the University of New South Wales, Australia.

Around one in six couples experiences infertility, amounting to 186 million people worldwide. Every year, more than two million undergo ART treatment cycles, which has produced around seven million “test-tube babies” since the first was born in 1978.

For first babies, success rate for IVF is increasing, but Australian statistics show it is still only 33% after the first cycle, and 54% to 77% by the eighth cycle – accruing a considerable physical, emotional and financial cost for couples.

To see how parents fare the second time round, Chambers’ team analysed data from more than 35,000 women in Australia and New Zealand who used their own eggs for IVF treatment and had a live baby between 2009 and 2013.

Mothers were followed up for another two years, to 2015, providing between two and seven years of follow-up data, and live births up to October 2016 were included.

The analysis calculated cycle-specific rates – the chance of having a second live birth in a particular cycle of treatment if previous cycles have failed – and cumulative live birth rate – the odds of achieving a live birth with repeated cycles.

They also looked at the characteristics of women who returned for IVF and what predicted their success.

They found 43% who had previously had an IVF baby returned to try again – intriguingly those who had needed more than one cycle were more likely to return – and 73% used an embryo that had been previously frozen.

Using frozen embryos proved somewhat more successful than using fresh ones.

Broken down by age, 30 to 34-year-old women had a 48% chance of delivering a second IVF baby after one cycle with frozen embryos and 43% with those freshly derived. After three cycles, this increased to 69% to 90% and 62% to 74%, respectively.

In 40 to 44-year-olds, 29% were successful after one cycle with frozen embryos, increasing to 38% to 55% after three cycles. Using fresh embryos, this dropped to 12% and 20% to 25%, respectively.

The conservative estimates of cumulative live birth rates assumed that women who dropped out wouldn’t have any chance of achieving a second live birth if they had continued treatment, while the optimal figures assumed they would have the same chance of a live birth as those who continued treatment.

Chances of success were also higher in women who left less than three years before going for baby number two.

“Couples can be reassured by these figures,” says Chambers, noting that it’s best not to wait too long, especially if new embryos are needed.

“Our findings also underline the fact that ART treatment should be considered as a course of treatment, rather than just one single cycle of treatment – if couples don’t achieve a pregnancy in the first cycle, it could very well happen in the next.”

Although the calculations offer a ball mark for couples who want to try for a second baby, co-author Devora Leiberman, a fertility clinician, notes they should be used against the backdrop of other influences.

“These results can be used to counsel patients,” she says, “but it is important to note that these are population estimates and every couple is different.

“Our analysis does not take account of all individual factors that affect a woman’s chance of ART success, including duration of infertility, and body mass index.”

More articles

Surrogacy UK welcomes Law Commission Consultation Paper on Reforming UK’s Outdated Surrogacy Laws

On 6th June, at a conference entitled ‘Reforming Surrogacy Laws: Future Directions and Possibilities’, the Law Commission of England and Wales and the Scottish Law Commission will launch their public consultation on reforming the UK’s outdated surrogacy laws. Surrogacy UK has long campaigned for legal reform and was consulted by the Law Commission in the preparation of their proposals.

Domicile and Surrogacy: The 5 W’s

“Where is your home?” seems like a simple question. But in our multi-cultural society, that is not always so. For intended parents in a surrogacy arrangement, it is one of the most important questions to ask.

Surrogacy UK Code of Practice update

The HFEA (Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority) govern and regulate all fertility treatments that take place in licensed fertility centres throughout the UK. The code of practice has recently been updated and we are awaiting the official issue of the 9th edition so that we can implement this into our clinical practice.

NHS Funding and Surrogacy

There’s been much discussion in recent days about the story in the Daily Mail about a same sex male couple in the UK who have received public funding for IVF treatment to try to create embryos using their own gametes and donor eggs.

Fertility regulator calls for clinics to be more open about treatment add-ons

The HFEA, the UK fertility regulator, has called for a change in how patients are offered optional fertility treatment add-ons.

Surrogacy Survey 2018 Results

Surrogates do not support calls for commercial surrogacy in the UK. Over 70 per cent of surrogates in the UK believe they should only be allowed to claim expenses when they carry a child for another couple, the UK’s largest ever survey into surrogacy has found.

Surrogacy UK welcomes individuals who want to start families

Surrogacy UK welcomes individuals who want to start families as UK Parliament votes to end three decades of discrimination.

Research findings from a longitudinal study of surrogacy families in the UK

Around the year 2000, a group of researchers, headed by Professor Susan Golombok, began a study of families created using surrogacy. I have worked on the project from its beginnings, when children in the study were one year old infants. Since then, our team has revisited the families five times and last saw them when the children were aged 14.

Host or Straight Surrogacy – Choosing your path

If you’re reading this then you will have most likely either made the choice that surrogacy is the path to parenthood that you wish to take, or you are close to taking that first big step.